Quantify the value of Netskope One SSE – Get the 2024 Forrester Total Economic Impact™ study

閉める
閉める
  • Netskopeが選ばれる理由 シェブロン

    ネットワークとセキュリティの連携方法を変える。

  • 導入企業 シェブロン

    Netskopeは、フォーチュン100社の30社以上を含む、世界中で3,400社以上の顧客にサービスを提供しています。

  • パートナー シェブロン

    私たちはセキュリティリーダーと提携して、クラウドへの旅を保護します。

SSEのリーダー。 現在、シングルベンダーSASEのリーダーです。

ネットスコープが2024年Gartner®社のシングルベンダーSASEのマジック・クアドラントでリーダーの1社の位置付けと評価された理由をご覧ください。

レポートを読む
顧客ビジョナリースポットライト

革新的な顧客が Netskope One プラットフォームを通じて、今日の変化するネットワークとセキュリティの状況をどのようにうまく乗り越えているかをご覧ください。

電子書籍を入手する
顧客ビジョナリースポットライト
Netskopeのパートナー中心の市場開拓戦略により、パートナーは企業のセキュリティを変革しながら、成長と収益性を最大化できます。

Netskope パートナーについて学ぶ
色々な若い専門家が集う笑顔のグループ
明日に向けたネットワーク

サポートするアプリケーションとユーザー向けに設計された、より高速で、より安全で、回復力のあるネットワークへの道を計画します。

ホワイトペーパーはこちら
明日に向けたネットワーク
Netskope Cloud Exchange

Netskope Cloud Exchange (CE) は、セキュリティポスチャに対する投資を活用するための強力な統合ツールを提供します。

Cloud Exchangeについて学ぶ
Aerial view of a city
  • Security Service Edge(SSE) シェブロン

    高度なクラウド対応の脅威から保護し、あらゆるベクトルにわたってデータを保護

  • SD-WAN シェブロン

    すべてのリモートユーザー、デバイス、サイト、クラウドへ安全で高性能なアクセスを提供

  • Secure Access Service Edge シェブロン

    Netskope One SASE は、クラウドネイティブで完全に統合された単一ベンダーの SASE ソリューションを提供します。

未来のプラットフォームはNetskopeです

Security Service Edge (SSE), Cloud Access Security Broker (CASB), Cloud Firewall, Next Generation Secure Web Gateway (SWG), and Private Access for ZTNA built natively into a single solution to help every business on its journey to Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) architecture.

製品概要はこちら
Netskopeの動画
Next Gen SASE Branch はハイブリッドである:接続、保護、自動化

Netskope Next Gen SASE Branchは、コンテキストアウェアSASEファブリック、ゼロトラストハイブリッドセキュリティ、 SkopeAI-Powered Cloud Orchestrator を統合クラウド製品に統合し、ボーダレスエンタープライズ向けに完全に最新化されたブランチエクスペリエンスを実現します。

Next Gen SASE Branchの詳細はこちら
オープンスペースオフィスの様子
ダミーのためのSASEアーキテクチャ

SASE設計について網羅した電子書籍を無償でダウンロード

電子書籍を入手する
ダミーのためのSASEアーキテクチャ eBook
最小の遅延と高い信頼性を備えた、市場をリードするクラウドセキュリティサービスに移行します。

NewEdgeの詳細
山腹のスイッチバックを通るライトアップされた高速道路
アプリケーションのアクセス制御、リアルタイムのユーザーコーチング、クラス最高のデータ保護により、生成型AIアプリケーションを安全に使用できるようにします。

生成AIの使用を保護する方法を学ぶ
ChatGPTと生成AIを安全に有効にする
SSEおよびSASE展開のためのゼロトラストソリューション

ゼロトラストについて学ぶ
大海原を走るボート
NetskopeがFedRAMPの高認証を達成

政府機関の変革を加速するには、Netskope GovCloud を選択してください。

Netskope GovCloud について学ぶ
Netskope GovCloud
  • リソース シェブロン

    クラウドへ安全に移行する上でNetskopeがどのように役立つかについての詳細は、以下をご覧ください。

  • ブログ シェブロン

    Netskopeがセキュアアクセスサービスエッジ(SASE)を通じてセキュリティとネットワーキングの変革を実現する方法をご覧ください

  • イベント&ワークショップ シェブロン

    最新のセキュリティトレンドを先取りし、仲間とつながりましょう。

  • 定義されたセキュリティ シェブロン

    サイバーセキュリティ百科事典、知っておくべきすべてのこと

「セキュリティビジョナリー」ポッドキャスト

2025年の予測
今回の Security Visionaries では、Wondros の社長であり、Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) の元首席補佐官である Kiersten Todt 氏が、2025 年以降の予測について語ります。

ポッドキャストを再生する Browse all podcasts
2025年の予測
最新のブログ

Netskopeがセキュアアクセスサービスエッジ(SASE)機能を通じてゼロトラストとSASEの旅をどのように実現できるかをお読みください。

ブログを読む
日の出と曇り空
SASE Week 2024 オンデマンド

SASEとゼロトラストの最新の進歩をナビゲートする方法を学び、これらのフレームワークがサイバーセキュリティとインフラストラクチャの課題に対処するためにどのように適応しているかを探ります

セッションの詳細
SASE Week 2024
SASEとは

クラウド優位の今日のビジネスモデルにおいて、ネットワークとセキュリティツールの今後の融合について学びます。

SASEについて学ぶ
  • 会社概要 シェブロン

    クラウド、データ、ネットワークセキュリティの課題に対して一歩先を行くサポートを提供

  • 採用情報 シェブロン

    Join Netskope's 3,000+ amazing team members building the industry’s leading cloud-native security platform.

  • カスタマーソリューション シェブロン

    お客様の成功のために、Netskopeはあらゆるステップを支援いたします。

  • トレーニングと認定 シェブロン

    Netskopeのトレーニングで、クラウドセキュリティのスキルを学ぶ

データセキュリティによる持続可能性のサポート

Netskope は、持続可能性における民間企業の役割についての認識を高めることを目的としたイニシアチブである「ビジョン2045」に参加できることを誇りに思っています。

詳しくはこちら
データセキュリティによる持続可能性のサポート
クラウドセキュリティの未来を形作る

At Netskope, founders and leaders work shoulder-to-shoulder with their colleagues, even the most renowned experts check their egos at the door, and the best ideas win.

チームに参加する
Netskopeで働く
Netskope dedicated service and support professionals will ensure you successful deploy and experience the full value of our platform.

カスタマーソリューションに移動
Netskopeプロフェッショナルサービス
Netskopeトレーニングで、デジタルトランスフォーメーションの旅を保護し、クラウド、ウェブ、プライベートアプリケーションを最大限に活用してください。

トレーニングと認定資格について学ぶ
働く若い専門家のグループ

Asia’s Evolving AI Regulatory Landscape: Lessons from Cybersecurity Regulation

Oct 03 2024

Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming industries across Asia, driving innovation, economic growth, and societal advancements. However, AI’s profound impact also brings significant governance challenges. As with any transformative technology, robust regulatory frameworks are essential to mitigate risks, ensure ethical use, and protect public interests.

Reflecting on the evolution of cybersecurity regulation may provide insight into how AI regulation might develop. This blog explores the current AI regulatory landscape in key Asian markets, highlighting how these countries are shaping their AI governance frameworks and what lessons can be drawn from their previous approaches to cybersecurity.

AI and cybersecurity regulation in Asia

The regulation of AI and cybersecurity in Asia has evolved as these technologies have become integral to economic and social structures. Cybersecurity regulation laid the foundation for managing technological risks and offers a template for AI governance. Across the region, countries are adopting varying approaches to AI regulation, influenced by their own experiences regulating cybersecurity. Understanding these parallels might predict how AI regulations develop and the challenges ahead.

Let’s take a closer look:

Singapore: A Leader in Proactive and Adaptive Regulation

Singapore has consistently positioned itself as a leader in both cybersecurity and AI regulation. The country’s Cybersecurity Act 2018 is a comprehensive framework that mandates stringent cybersecurity practices across critical information infrastructure sectors, underscoring Singapore’s commitment to proactive governance and international collaboration.

In the AI domain, Singapore has adopted an equally forward-looking approach. Tools like AI Verify, developed by the Infocomm Media Development Authority (IMDA) and the Personal Data Protection Commission (PDPC), enable organisations to assess the transparency and accountability of their AI systems, akin to how cybersecurity frameworks evaluate the resilience of digital defences.

Singapore also promotes innovation within regulatory boundaries through sandbox testing environments, allowing companies to trial AI technologies in a controlled setting. As reflected in the Model AI Governance Framework, this adaptive approach demonstrates how lessons from cybersecurity—such as the importance of rigorous testing and compliance—can inform AI regulation.

Japan: From voluntary guidelines to stricter oversight

Japan’s regulatory approach in both cybersecurity and AI has historically emphasised voluntary guidelines and industry self-regulation. The Cybersecurity Management Guidelines issued by the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI) initially focused on voluntary compliance. However, as cyber threats have intensified, Japan has implemented stricter measures, particularly in sectors critical to national security.

Similarly, Japan’s AI regulation is transitioning from a voluntary model towards more formal oversight. AI Utilisation Guidelines are evolving, with the government moving towards stricter regulations for high-impact AI applications in sectors like healthcare and finance. This shift parallels Japan’s approach to cybersecurity, where mandatory requirements have increasingly reinforced voluntary practices as the risks associated with these technologies have become more apparent.

South Korea: Building trust through clear and transparent regulations

Comprehensive and transparent regulatory frameworks, such as the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, have characterised South Korea’s approach to cybersecurity. These frameworks are designed to protect critical infrastructure and build public trust—a principle carried over into South Korea’s AI governance strategy.

The National AI Strategy reflects South Korea’s commitment to fostering public trust in AI technologies. By establishing clear guidelines and ethical standards, South Korea aims to create a regulatory environment where innovation can thrive without compromising public safety or trust. This strategy mirrors the country’s cybersecurity efforts, emphasising transparency, accountability, and protecting sensitive data.

China: A prescriptive and controlled regulatory environment

China’s regulatory environment for cybersecurity and AI is highly prescriptive, reflecting the government’s focus on control and oversight. The Cybersecurity Law and the Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL) are central to China’s efforts to regulate digital technologies, imposing strict requirements on organisations handling sensitive data.

China has adopted a similarly stringent approach to AI. Regulations like the Provisions on the Management of Deep Synthesis Technology and the Artificial Intelligence Standardisation White Paper outline comprehensive governance frameworks for AI, particularly in areas such as algorithm development and content moderation. This prescriptive approach aims to align AI development with state objectives, ensuring that AI technologies support social stability and national security—just as cybersecurity regulations are designed to safeguard the digital landscape.

Taiwan: Moving towards AI regulation

Taiwan is advancing its AI regulatory framework. The National Science and Technology Council (NSTC) has drafted an AI law focusing on the use, reliability, and risk mitigation of AI technologies. This law is expected to be sent to the Cabinet for approval in October 2024, marking a significant step in Taiwan’s commitment to developing a robust AI governance framework. This mirrors Taiwan’s earlier efforts in cybersecurity, where the government introduced strict guidelines to protect against cyber threats while promoting technological innovation.

Taiwan is actively engaging with industry stakeholders and experts to ensure that the AI law is both comprehensive and adaptable to the rapidly evolving technological landscape. The government aims to strike a balance between fostering innovation and ensuring that AI technologies are implemented safely and ethically. By building on its experience in cybersecurity regulation, Taiwan is positioning itself as a key player in the global AI regulatory environment, demonstrating a strong commitment to both technological advancement and public safety.

Australia: Transitioning from voluntary guidelines to targeted regulation

Australia’s cybersecurity regulation traditionally combined voluntary practices with mandatory requirements for critical infrastructure, as exemplified by the guidelines provided by the Australian Cyber Security Centre (ACSC). Over time, Australia has moved towards more stringent oversight, reflecting the growing importance of cybersecurity to national security and economic resilience.

Similarly, Australia’s approach to AI regulation is evolving from voluntary guidelines to more targeted regulation, particularly for high-risk areas like privacy and data protection. The AI Ethics Framework is the foundation for this transition, focusing on transparency, accountability, and human-centred design principles. As with cybersecurity, Australia’s AI regulation will likely become more prescriptive as the risks associated with AI technologies become clearer.

India: Developing frameworks for emerging technologies

India is in the early stages of developing comprehensive regulatory frameworks for both cybersecurity and AI. The Information Technology (IT) Act 2000 and its subsequent amendments provide the foundation for cybersecurity governance, focusing on protecting critical infrastructure and personal data.

In the realm of AI, India’s National Strategy for Artificial Intelligence outlines the country’s vision for leveraging AI for inclusive growth. Although formal AI regulations are still under development, the strategy highlights the need for ethical AI deployment, particularly in healthcare, agriculture, and education. India’s evolving approach to AI regulation parallels its cybersecurity efforts, focusing on building the necessary infrastructure and frameworks to support technological innovation while safeguarding public interests.

Several trends emerge when comparing AI and cybersecurity regulation across these countries:

  • Evolution from voluntary to mandatory regulations: Both AI and cybersecurity regulations often start with voluntary guidelines, gradually evolving into mandatory requirements as the risks and impacts of these technologies become more apparent.
  • Balancing innovation with protection of public interests: Regulatory frameworks in both domains strive to foster innovation while protecting public interests, such as privacy, security, and ethical standards.
  • Emphasis on transparency and accountability: Transparency and accountability are central to building public trust in AI and cybersecurity. Clear guidelines and compliance mechanisms are crucial for maintaining this trust.
  • Growing importance of international cooperation: Just as cybersecurity requires international collaboration to address global threats, AI regulation is increasingly seen as a global issue, necessitating harmonisation of standards across borders.

Learning from Cybersecurity: Shaping Future AI Regulation

The evolution of cybersecurity regulation offers valuable lessons for developing AI governance frameworks. As AI technologies become more integral to our lives, the need for robust, transparent, and enforceable rules will grow. By learning from experiences in cybersecurity, Asian countries can develop AI regulations that foster innovation, protect public interests, and maintain trust.

Understanding the parallels between AI and cybersecurity regulation is important for businesses operating across these markets. Navigating the complex regulatory landscape requires staying informed about evolving requirements and adopting proactive strategies to ensure compliance in both domains.

If you’d like to learn more, check out my conversation with David Fairman where we dive deeper into the topic of cyber security compliance in the age of AI from Netskope SASE Week (on-demand), where our session “Mastering Cybersecurity Compliance in APAC” provides valuable Insight and Best Practices from your peers in the industry.

author image
Josh Kennedy-White
Josh Kennedy-White is a CxO Advisor for Netskope in APAC to collaborate with the teams in the Middle-East and North Africa.
Josh Kennedy-White is a CxO Advisor for Netskope in APAC to collaborate with the teams in the Middle-East and North Africa.

Stay informed!

Subscribe for the latest from the Netskope Blog